Wikipedia Editors Summarize Key Features to Identify AI-Generated Writing
-
In recent years, the advancement of artificial intelligence technology has brought us many conveniences, but it has also sparked discussions about the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated text. Particularly in academia, AI-generated content is often seen as a shortcut, yet the potential issues of such shortcuts cannot be overlooked. Wikipedia, as a platform built on trust and human reliability, explicitly prohibits articles written by AI. Editors have compiled a list of linguistic 'telltale signs' that reveal AI-generated writing.
AI-generated text often exhibits an exaggerated tone, frequently using repetitive phrasing to emphasize importance. For example, AI might use terms like 'important' or 'historically significant,' which often come across as rigid. Additionally, AI-generated paragraphs tend to conclude with simplistic summaries or viewpoints, giving the impression of a high school essay rather than a professional encyclopedia entry. Common transitional phrases like 'furthermore' or 'additionally' make the text appear overly formal or even stiff, whereas human editors typically employ more natural expressions.
Formatting is another key clue for identifying AI-generated text. AI-produced articles often feature excessive lists, sometimes accompanied by unusual bullet points or numbering styles. Section headings are frequently written in title case (capitalizing every major word), whereas humans tend to prefer simpler styling. Moreover, AI writing often overuses bold text to emphasize certain phrases—a practice less common among human editors. Interestingly, AI-generated text may also include excessive dashes, misplaced quotation marks, or even emojis in headings.
Citations are often the Achilles' heel of AI-generated text. AI might fabricate non-existent links, generate fake ISBNs or DOIs, or even cite 'experts' who never appear in the text. Sometimes, while references are mentioned, they are not actually listed in the article. Additionally, errors in Wikipedia-specific markup, such as improper use of templates or categories, can also expose AI-generated content. Overall, AI-generated text tends to be more predictable and lacks the personalized touch of human writing.
While these signals alone are not definitive proof, the presence of multiple such features in a text should raise concerns.
Key Takeaways:
AI-generated text often uses an exaggerated tone and repetitive phrasing to emphasize importance.
AI-produced articles exhibit unusual formatting, such as excessive lists and unconventional markup.
Citations frequently include fabricated links or non-existent references.